Mangino Trial Mockery of Constitution

The Mangino Trial - a Mockery of the Constitution; Dr. Paul Heberle; War on Doctors/Pain Crisis blog of the Pain Relief Network; 2007-09-14; posted: 2007-09-23.

Public Declaration of truth and support for the Natural-bourne American (and convicted felon) William Mangino; provided in a Court of Record in the State of Pennsylvania

See also the:
Dr. Klees Imprisoned, Dr. Heberle Exonerated, Pain Patients Abandoned
archives.

I am present today to speak on behalf of the American known as William Mangino with name properly expressed in both capital and small letters. I am compelled to do so by virtue of having experienced a similar plight in the recent past.

I had the unfortunate experience of being victimized by supposed public servants in an intentionally orchestrated false prosecution. The experience has forever changed my impression of the nature of our country and our justice system.

Being thrown into such circumstances allowed me to witness many things that would make any honest American shudder.

1. I saw public servants in law enforcement ally themselves with criminals in order to frame the innocent;

2. I witnessed an agent of the law manipulate in order to allowed a forger of prescriptions to function. It is my opinion that these forgeries were allowed so that they could be blamed on a physician who knew nothing of their existence. Later, local police ignored the issue and did not arrest the forger. When he finally was arrested, this forger of narcotics prescriptions received a trivial charge in court compared to the multiple felonies he had committed with the assistance of a public servant sworn to uphold our national constitution.

3. I listened to stories of patients who were verbally and physically intimidated in their own homes to establish a fraudulent investigation.

4. I sat in court, having to bite my tongue, while perjury was given on the stand and a Pennsylvania prosecutor withheld evidence to the contrary in his hand at the moment at which the perjury was elicited.

I could go on at great length enumerating the blatant corruption and criminality that I witnessed on the part of public servants, but it would serve no purpose in this forum. I do not know whether or not the case against William Mangino was as intentionally malicious as the case against me was. We did, however, have one fraud investigator named Sean Murphy in common.

This was the only public servant that I encountered who appeared to be honest. He spoke for the prosecution at my trial, but was no longer serving as fraud investigator by that time. This same agent was involved in the investigation of William Mangino, yet he was not used in the trial against him. I believe that the court and any American would do well to learn this honest man was not used for condemnatory testimony against this innocent physician.

Assuming the case against William Mangino was not malicious in nature, we still have a travesty of justice before us. I have practiced as a physician. I have had the opportunity to manage pain patients and I have treated addiction patients extensively as well. This man has not violated any principle of medicine.

I cannot see where he has even violated a law. The law in question says nothing of the “bounds of medicine.” This is not in the letter of the law. It is a concept, verbiage added to confuse the jury about medical practice, and prejudice them against the accused physician. Obviously this corrupt tactic works quite well.

William Mangino is also accused and convicted of Medicaid fraud. He was not contracted with a Medicaid program. He never billed a Medicaid program. He never engaged such an entity. How is it possible to defraud an entity with which you have not had contact or exchanged information? Even the simplest minds should see a problem here.

Even worse, the amount of time that will be erased from William Mangino’s life by incarceration comes down to the weight of Tylenol. This is a common, uncontrolled substance that any one of us can purchase freely in a pharmacy, grocery store, or gas station. A result such as this is an embarrassment to our justice system and our country.

Perhaps worst of all, is the fact that Dr. William Mangino has not received a trial by jury of his peers. In the constitutional sense, peers are not the persons that we know. They are not people that work in the same profession as we do. Our constitution is the rule book for public servants to follow in order to preserve the rights described in our foundational document.

(Not) Submitted (but) Expressed this 14th day of September, 2007, in the 231st year of Declared American independence, respectfully by Dr. Paul Heberle, Inhabitant of Pennsylvania, American Union of States and Constitutional Republic, to Judge Motto in the Sentencing hearing of Dr. William Mangino.
== == == == ==
[Editor's note]:
This essay by Dr. Heberle represents notes written prior to his spoken testimony for Mangino during Sentencing, 2007-09-14. This document was not formally submitted to Judge Motto, nor was it used as a scripted statement by Dr. Heberle.