Challenge of Prescription Drug Misuse…
The Challenge of Prescription Drug Misuse: A Review and Commentary (full text + link to PDF) William Hurwitz, M.D.; Pain Medicine; 6(2); 152-161; March 2005.
INTRODUCTION, REFERENCES, and FOOTNOOTES
This article presents an analysis of the patterns of illicit use of prescription pain relievers, of the likely structure of the illicit market, and of the complexity of pain management. It suggests that a federal enforcement policy focused on physicians is unlikely to reduce the overall use of illicit drugs, but that it is likely to have an adverse impact on the ethical structure of medical care and to compromise the effectiveness of pain treatment. Pain medications, such as OxyContin, Vicodin, and Methadone, have received increased government and media attention over the last 2 or 3 years, as the growth of their application in the treatment of patients with acute and chronic pain has been accompanied by an increase in reported drug abuse and dependence, adverse medical events, and pharmacy robberies. In response, the federal government announced a new initiative to control prescription drug abuse. 1 Various proposed measures, including heightened scrutiny of physicians’ practices, increased prosecution of physicians, increased restrictions on a number of pain medications, drug monitoring programs to catch “doctor shoppers,” and encouragement of more rigorous patient screening, will, it is claimed, limit the diversion of prescription medications from medical channels. In its 2002 review of OxyContin diversion, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) stated “Illegal acts by physicians and pharmacists are the primary sources of diverted pharmaceuticals available on the illicit market.” 2 The DEA report goes on to identify other sources of diversion, including doctor shopping, robberies, burglaries, thefts, illicit internet distribution, drug gang distribution, and foreign diversion. In view of the multiplicity of sources and the lack of quantitative information regarding the contribution of each source to the illicit market, it is not clear on what basis the DEA claimed that physicians and pharmacists are the primary sources. However, the recently proposed measures to control diversion and abuse appear to be predicated on the assumption that medications diverted to illicit use come primarily from prescriptions issued by criminal or inadequately vigilant doctors to inappropriate patients, who abuse or divert prescribed medications. It would follow from this assumption that removal of the “bad apples” among doctors and that greater precision by well-intentioned doctors in directing prescriptions to appropriate patients would reduce the quantities available for misuse. It is further assumed that restricting the supply of medications available for diversion from medical practice will restrict the access of would-be illicit users to prescription medications, and that restricted access will lower the overall burden of substance abuse. Whether the new enforcement policy will limit diversion or reduce substance abuse remains to be seen.
[Full text of this article in HTML with link to PDF]
REFERENCES1. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Davis DH. Narcotic use in southeast Asia and afterward. An interview study of 898 Vietnam returnees. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1975;32(8):955
61.
2. Jonathan C. How prevalent are “very light” drug users? The FAS Drug Policy Analysis Bulletin 1997; Issue 3, September. Available at http://www.fas.org/drugs/issue3.htm (accessed June 2004).
3. Coleman N. Rx Roulette on the Internet. Wall Street Journal, June 17, 2004; p. A18.
4. DEA News Release. The myth of the “chilling effect.” October 30, 2003. Available at http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/pressrel/pr103003.html (accessed June 2004).
5. Joranson DE, Ryan KM, Gilson AM, Dahl JL. Trends in medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics. JAMA 2000;283(13):171014.
6. Novak S, Nemeth WC, Lawson KA. Trends in medical use and abuse of sustained-release opioid analgesics: A revisit. Pain Med 2004;5(1):5965.
7. Fountain J, Strang J, Gossop M, Farrell M, Griffiths P. Diversion of prescribed drugs by drug users in treatment: Analysis of the UK market and new data from London. Addiction 2000;95(3):393406.
8. Jamison RN, Kauffman J, Katz NP. Characteristics of methadone maintenance patients with chronic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000;19(1):5362.
9. Rosenblum A, Joseph H, Fong C, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain among chemically dependent patients in methadone maintenance and residential treatment facilities. JAMA 2003;289(18):23708.
10. Salsitz EA, Joseph H, Frank B, et al. Methadone medical maintenance (MMM): Treating chronic opioid dependence in private medical practice
A summary report (19831998). Mt Sinai J Med 2000;67(56):38897.
11. King VL, Stoller KB, Hayes M, et al. A multicenter randomized evaluation of methadone medical maintenance. Drug Alcohol Depend 2002;65(2):13748.
12. Peter S, Joe S. Detainees’ medical files shared, Guantanamo interrogators’ access criticized. Washington Post, Thursday, June 10, 2004; p. A01.
FOOTNOTES 1Office of National Drug Control Policy Press Release, U.S. Drug Prevention, Treatment, Enforcement Agencies Take on “Doctor Shoppers,”"Pill Mills,” March 1, 2004. 2Drug Intelligence Brief, Oxycontin: Pharmaceutical Diversion March 2002. Available at http://www.usdoj.gov/dea/pubs/intel/02017/02017p.html (Note: All websites in the footnotes were accessed in June, 2004). 3The National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) is available online at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k2nsduh/html/toc.htm . The drug use prevalence data in this article are extracted from Tables 1.1B, 1.2B, 1.3B, 1.4B, 1.19B, 1.26B, 5.25B, 5.27B, and 8.2N accessible through the referenced website or from Tables H.1 through H.6, H.16, H.22, and H.44 from SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies, National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 2002 at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k2nsduh/Results/appH.htm . 4Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), published by the American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 1994.
5Available at http://allpsych.com/disorders/substance/index.html .
6Table H.16, Alcohol Use, Percentages, 2002, Table H.22, Cigarette Use, Percentages, 2002, and Table H.6, Any illicit Drug Use, Percentages, 2002 referenced earlier.
7These data are extracted from the DAWN data available at http://dawninfo.samhsa.gov .
8Table H.27 (Marijuana), H.28 (Cocaine), H.30 (Ecstasy), and H.31 (Pain Reliever) at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k2nsduh/Results/appH.htm .
9Table H.35 (Marijuana), H.36 (Cocaine), H.38 (Ecstasy), and H.39 (Pain Reliever) at http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nhsda/2k2nsduh/Results/appH.htm .
10Information Brief: Prescription Drug Abuse and Youth, National Drug Intelligence Center, Document ID: 2002-L0424-004, August 2002.
11“On average, 2 drugs were mentioned in each ED visit involving narcotic analgesics, and more than 1 drug was involved in 72% of the visits . . . Cocaine taken with unspecified narcotic analgesics was the most frequently reported combination in 2001.”The Dawn Report, January 2003. Available at http://dawninfo.samhsa.gov/pubs_94_02/shortreports/files/DAWN%20Report%20 NA_10.pdf.
12Table H.1, NSDUH, 2002.
[END]
Tags: Chilling effect, chronic pain, dea, diversion, drug policy, opioid, pain management, prescription drug abuse, statistics, william hurwitz
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
If you want to leave a feedback to this post or to some other user´s comment, simply fill out the form below.