AP: Pain Med Use in Arizona

Arizona Use of 3 Of 5 Top Painkillers Soars; Arthur H. Rotstein; Tuscon Citizen; 2007-08-20. Posted: War on Doctors/Pain Crisis blog of the Pain Relief Network; 2007-08-21. Source


Disabled after 11 back surgeries for what one doctor called “a congenitally deficient spine,” Mary Lynn O’Connor has taken prescription painkillers Oxycontin or morphine for the past seven years. They’ve restored a semblance of normalcy, she says.

O’Connor, a Phoenix grandmother of four, is a prime example why use of prescription painkillers has soared in Arizona and nationwide in recent years. “It makes all the difference in the world in being able to function, in being able to do things like go to the grocery store,” she said.

Prescriptions for several of the nation’s most popular painkillers have increased dramatically across the state and country over an eight-year period, signaling greater acceptance of narcotics for pain management by doctors and patients and recognition of the need by federal authorities, experts say. Using U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, The Associated Press analyzed prescriptions for codeine, hydrocodone, meperidine, morphine and oxycodone by super-ZIP codes in each state.

Arizona’s experience from 1997 to 2005 largely mirrored or exceeded the national growth in painkiller prescriptions.

Prescriptions in Arizona increased for hydrocodone, the generic form of Vicodin or Lortab, by 187 percent; for morphine by about 377 percent — more than twice as much as nationwide — and for oxycodone, the generic version of Oxycontin or Percodan, by 640 percent.

Nationwide, their prescribed amounts increased by 199, 154 and 591 percent, respectively. The percentage changes were measured on the basis of grams distributed per 100,000 people through retail pharmacies.

Meanwhile, gram distribution of prescribed codeine decreased 25 percent nationally and 28 percent statewide. It fell 8 percent for meperidine (Demerol) in Arizona and 26 percent nationwide.

Under federal law, the Drug Enforcement Administration monitdors controlled substances from manufacture through retail distribution; the transactions are used to track the drugs’ diversion into illicit channels.

The Associated Press analyzed the data for retail sales of the five painkillers state-by-state, grouping “super” neighborhoods by using the first three numbers of each ZIP code.

The U.S. Postal Service divides Arizona into 11 such regions — for instance, 850 for metropolitan Phoenix, 865 for the far northeastern corner, encompassing Apache and Navajo counties and 859 for eastern Arizona.

Only in the 860 region, the most north-central portion of the state including Flagstaff and numerous Navajo and Hopi Indian communities, did usage increase for all five drugs examined — from a scant. 0.4 percent for meperidine to 466 percent for morsphine. The gram distribution per 100,000 population of hydrocodone, morphine and oxycodone, increased in all 11 super-ZIP codes statewide, shooting up most notably for the latter.

But even for codeine and meperidine, whose overall usage statewide dropped, there were upward spikes. Codeine rose across northern, northeastern and eastern Arizona and meperidine went up across the northern, northwestern and southwesternmost portions of the state.

Both of those drugs have fallen into disfavor with many physicians for reasons including adverse side-effects.

Dr. Stephen Borowsky, a Phoenix anesthesiologist and president of the Arizona Pain Society, said he believes the statistics in Arizona may be skewed for areas including Indian reservations (notably the 865, 860 and 859 ZIPs).

Wand said Indian Health Service authorities told him that that “they wrote prescriptions but didn’t bill” for them until around 1999, and the numbers showed a huge jump.

But why are painkillers being prescribed more?

Borowsky said the practice of pain management has mushroomed in recent years. The field has been a board-certified medical subspecialty since 1993.

Among related developments, Borowsky said, there has been “an acceptance of using opiates for noncancer patients. “First, the big issue was that it was considered inappropriate for noncancer patients years ago, because of addiction.

“Then, it was recognized that patients weren’t going to become addicted and that it was the only humane thing to do. In more recent years, it became more acceptable for noncancer patients to be treated this way,” though doctors remain ambivalent, concerned about “treating people appropriately, but … still worrying about big brother watching,” he said.

Arizona Medical Board spokesman Roger Downey reiterated that point.

There’s been concern “on one hand that we don’t get people addicted to medications, but then there’s this concern that we have to ease the pain… then there’s this concern that we don’t want to overprescribe, but we also don’t want to underprescribe,” he said.

“Don’t make the leap of saying increased narcotics use is bad,” Dr. Michael Katz, a University of Arizona College of Pharmacy clinical associate professor, cautioned.

The public is likely to view the percentage increases and conclude that “`Wow, we’ve got a huge problem,”‘ he said. “There may be some issues there, but I think some of this is because we’re doing better in treating pain.”

Lynn O’Connor, the Phoenix woman whose back issues began with ruptured discs, has undergone surgeries including laminectomies, spinal fusions and rod insertions. For more than a year she took OxyContin and for the past six years has taken morphine tablets daily to relieve her constant pain after epidural injections were no longer possible.

Outside her home, she walks with crutches or rides in an electric cart, but she sews, works crossword puzzles and can drive.

“I’m just so grateful that I can do what I can do, and function,” she said. “Would I rather be off the medication? Yes. But I would not give up my life, and I take it.”

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Related posts

2 Comments »

  1. Comment by James Stacks

    This AP analysis is resulting in a real media blitz, most of which is the default fear-mongering stuff. Authors in different publications are putting their local twists on it, and most of it is the same old fear propaganda. I wonder why they are doing this? It takes a lot of money and power to launch an ignorance campaign like this, and somebody has suddenly decided it is time to deal us blow.

    One of the more poignant metabolites of this AP release is an article entitled “Painkiller Widely Abused in South” published in Washington Post (by Tom Breen, Associated Press, http://tinyurl.com/3y87dm )

    In this article, most of the quotes come from one Steve Dotson, who is apparently recovering from some type of drug problem. The story starts out with a shocking story of how he intentionally injured himself to get pain meds (had his wife to run over his leg with a car). The implication is that hydrocodone caused him to perform this foolish stunt.

    This was also interesting:

    “He is determined to stay off drugs, and recently chose to pull out his own tooth with pliers to avoid the temptation of receiving a prescription for a hydrocodone-based painkiller after the extraction.”

    Now, that’s rational behavior. Could we know a little more about Mr. Dotson’s history?

    Another quote I found interesting is this:

    “Authorities say hydrocodone is so popular in this region partly because it’s easy to acquire.” Yeah, right. Need to tighten up those controls, now, don’t we? Maybe a little more drug war money for said “authorities”? Since when is hydrocodone “easy” to acquire anywhere in the United States? It is damn near impossible.

    At least most of the doctors being interviewed are taking a reserved and rational approach, but their quotes are being hidden in insignificant little crannies behind the colorful “horror stories” from individuals on whom little information is given (such as credentials or history).

    It looks like it is having quite an impact. How do fight this?

    PRN and others are being referred to as “some activists”, with a lot of “some activists say…, but…” lines.

  2. Comment by doctordeluca

    Hello James,

    The article you are talking about - Painkiller Widely Abused in South - http://tinyurl.com/3y87dm is one of the more grotesque examples of the genre, not because the acts describe are so horrific (I can handle the do it yourself with pliers tooth extraction passage, though I wince and tense every read).

    No, what is notable and very creepy is what you are noticing too - this bizarre behavior is reported as completely rational and normative. Drugs ARE that bad. You’d be lucky to have Steve as your sponsor should you ever darken the doors of Narcotics Anonymous.

    As to overall effect of the AP package - what I hear is that they are themselves surprised at the appetite for various parts of the content. It is largely negative, especially when only material from the moral panic part; BUT, I think our part is getting through as well. Bass DID get Siobhan and Fernandez and Bordeaux’s husband Ed Swaim in. All that material is there for the mining as well - and it will slowly come out.

    For example, James Fernandez tells me that he is featured in many articles in the area around Fredricksberg where he lives. I have to find a second to collect a few of those.

    Believe it or not am still wrestling with the Fleming study - I’m finding it complex, which means something is off. Your comments were a big help as an organizing first pass through the stats. It really is an interesting and important study which I’ll enjoy discussing further.

    Gotta go - am installing a Comments email plugin that will let you’all be notified if there is any further development in this string or that. I think. Enjoy.

    ..alex…

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

If you want to leave a feedback to this post or to some other user´s comment, simply fill out the form below.

(required)

(required)